Interested in using eDNA sampling for terrestrial species detection?
A key factor in determining the use of eDNA sampling for species detection, is considering how and where species are shedding DNA into the environment. To date, our species detection services have mainly involved aquatic-based testing. Water samples present a great opportunity for eDNA surveys because DNA spreads throughout aquatic environments. This means you don’t have the challenge of needing to locate exactly where the species is or was when undertaking eDNA water sampling.
Water sampling to detect terrestrial species
Using eDNA water sampling is highly effective at detecting aquatic species, and in some cases detecting terrestrial species. Waterways act as a sink, capturing DNA from surrounding wildlife who visit, fly over or inhabit areas close to the waterway. Furthermore, getting creative with water sampling for terrestrial species can pay off as the water doesn’t always need to come from a waterway. There is an opportunity to strategically use unique sampling methodologies that can target species of interest. For example, this study was undertaken using eDNA to detect an agricultural insect pest - the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug - by sampling rinse water from a variety crops.
So, what's new? Using other environmental samples to detect terrestrial species
Generally, terrestrial species aren’t shedding as much DNA into aquatic environments which would allow for easy eDNA sampling as noted above. So a new question arises, how do we capture their DNA in the environment without having to physically locate them?
EnviroDNA scientist, Farley Connelly, has been researching into the exciting new developments of eDNA sampling for terrestrial species:
“New techniques are quickly developing! The list of samples that eDNA can be extracted from to detect land-based animals is increasing and now includes pooled water, faeces, soil, plant material and even blood collected in ectoparasites. In two separate studies, researchers in China and Bangladesh utilized blood from leeches to detect species richness in forest habitats (Weiskopf et al 2017; Ji et al. 2020). In both studies, leeches proved to be an effective vector to measure species diversity. The use of eDNA as a terrestrial biodiversity survey technique is still in the early days but the results so far are exciting!”
Want to use eDNA for detecting terrestrial species?
Here are some key questions to consider when deciding if eDNA is a valuable tool for your wildlife detection challenge:
- Where will the species likely shed DNA (e.g. where is it spending its time?)
- Given the above, what type of environmental sample would make sense to collect to assess for this species eDNA? (e.g. soil, scats, water etc)
- How can we collect this environmental sample in a targeted and efficient manner? Is it even possible to do so? (e.g. targeting soil samples from animal scratchings)
By Jacquie Murphy, EnviroDNA Business & Communications Officer
Farley Connelly, EnviroDNA Program Officer - Aquatic & Field Ecology
As our research in this area continues to grow, our available services in eDNA terrestrial sampling will also expand. We would be more than happy explore these techniques with you if you are interested!
Please contact one of our amazing scientists, Farley Connelly, to discuss further:
Ph: +61 3 9028 8753.
This article draws on findings from:
Ji Y, Baker CC, Li Y, Popescu V, Wang Z, Wang J, Wang L, Wu C, Hua C, Yang Z, Yang C, Xu CC, Wen Q, Pierce N, Yu D (2020) Large-scale Quantification of Vertebrate Biodiversity in Ailaoshan Nature Reserve from Leech iDNA. (Pre-print) Source
Leempoel K, Hebert T, Hadly, EA (2020) A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1918), 20192353. Source
Weiskopf SR, McCarthy KP, Tessler M, Rahman HA, McCarthy JL, Hersch R, Faisal MM, Siddall ME (2018). Using terrestrial haematophagous leeches to enhance tropical biodiversity monitoring programmes in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(4), 2071–2081. Source